<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hybrid Models for Non-Profits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.globalgiving.org/2010/10/26/hybrid-models-for-non-profits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.globalgiving.org/2010/10/26/hybrid-models-for-non-profits/</link>
	<description>GlobalGiving Blog - News and Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 18:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne Brye-Vela</title>
		<link>http://blog.globalgiving.org/2010/10/26/hybrid-models-for-non-profits/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne Brye-Vela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.globalgiving.org/?p=809#comment-687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find this interesting. Your intention is to create a business(all the efficiencies of the private sector) with a social good objective, but not fully understanding what the advantages and disadvantages are to establishing a nonprofit. Yes, the for benefit/hybrid models can be successful, if the best elements of both were combined.  The Trial and error doesn&#039;t have to exist, a perfect example of this model is the Nonprofit Resources (which sells insurance to nonprofits) www.npresources.org - They existed for years (I worked from them in the early 90&#039;s as the first marketing assoc. before this was a trend and use them as a model for new companies).  there is an error i must not that I understand 100% of the for-profit business shares must go back to the nonprofit (referring  &quot;GGF owns 98% of MFI&quot; - can you explain why only 98. and the board must be two separate boards with no cross over - otherwise you deal with &quot;self dealing laws etc).  Nevertheless, there is alot to cover and so little time. Please feel free to contact me, I would love to ask more questions. Yvonne Brye-Vela, Founder of Charitymakers.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this interesting. Your intention is to create a business(all the efficiencies of the private sector) with a social good objective, but not fully understanding what the advantages and disadvantages are to establishing a nonprofit. Yes, the for benefit/hybrid models can be successful, if the best elements of both were combined.  The Trial and error doesn&#8217;t have to exist, a perfect example of this model is the Nonprofit Resources (which sells insurance to nonprofits) <a href="http://www.npresources.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.npresources.org</a> &#8211; They existed for years (I worked from them in the early 90&#8242;s as the first marketing assoc. before this was a trend and use them as a model for new companies).  there is an error i must not that I understand 100% of the for-profit business shares must go back to the nonprofit (referring  &#8220;GGF owns 98% of MFI&#8221; &#8211; can you explain why only 98. and the board must be two separate boards with no cross over &#8211; otherwise you deal with &#8220;self dealing laws etc).  Nevertheless, there is alot to cover and so little time. Please feel free to contact me, I would love to ask more questions. Yvonne Brye-Vela, Founder of Charitymakers.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
